I have just moved to San Diego, CA from Atlanta, GA and while the real estate markets reflect drastically different valuation propositions, I am intrigued with the buy vs. lease question. San Diego's rental market offers as many attractive opportunities as its "for sale" market - but it allows a buyer to enjoy a more comparable, attractive home to what was available in Atlanta. On the other hand, if there was ever a time to buy in San Diego, wouldn't it be over the next 6 - 12 months? Also, when factoring in the ancillary costs of ownership (ie., financing, closing costs, other services needed to improve a home), its probably a pretty good time to buy given the recessionary market conditions.
I would be very interested in others weighing in on this question. You can assume that I have some ability to buy / finance a home but not one as nice as I can comfortably rent in very nice parts of San Diego.
Western Bound



Replies
0
Posted on: Tue, 01/06/2009 - 00:58
#1
The Title Wizard
Here is a good resource, where you can see a Rent vs. Buy comparison chart. This should help you.
Reply
0
Posted on: Tue, 10/28/2008 - 19:41
#2
National Agent
In general, renting is a temporary solution to housing. You are giving money to someone else for their long-term benefit. If you buy, you get this benefit. It is a great time to be a buyer.
Reply
La Jolla, CA
http://www.ginniemae.gov/rent_vs_buy/Rent_vs_buy.asp?subTitle=YPTH
St. Louis, MO